The Tower of Babel is reconstructed

The internet. The traditional media. The personality as career. The expedient truth. The rhetoric, and reputation validating opinion. The transformations of common knowledge as scientific development tosses and turns like a fevered patient. Morgoth decided he didn't know what to believe about the Coronavirus, because there are too many conflicting realities that we should know about it. A wise choice when compared to the vitriol of those who know the truth

 This claimed epidemic has torn the veil on humanities current condition, brought about by all writhing peoples of the world being brought into anxious proximity by economic and political exploitation of the ruling class.

 All the written word in the current discourse in English is plagued with neologisms, old words are reforged through "nuance" and the identify of the speaker taints his idea through the sin of his origin, his beliefs or his perceived intent. People have become too clever and are now unable to trust anyone. Who would do something but out of their own interest? If someone is acting in their own interest, how could you possibly trust them? Only if their interest matches yours, only if you are on the same side.

 This is a source of common purity spiralling in the dissident right, it is fuel for effeminate commissars to get insensitive teenagers booted off the online discourse. The potters wheel seems now to be turning at such a speed that even the hook nosed masters seem to be struggling to contain the direction of mass discourse.

 There are fables regarding Golems going out of control. There are fables regarding the calamity that followed all peoples of the world coming to a great unifying tower. Gods punishment may be a very simple way to describe a series of consecutive poorly managed decisions building up to a point where they collapse all together.

 If the disease is real, and an ethnically diverse, politically energized, rhetorically sensitive western nation, whose native born individuals are demoralized, whose most fecund members have no link to the landscape? What happens when Babel finally collapses, but there are no empty corners of the earth to which the stunned inhabitants can scatter?

 Better now to return to known truths, familiar faces. Who do you care about? What are you willing to do for them? What do you want to do with your life? What are you willing to do to achieve it? Who could you trust? For tasks that no single man can accomplish, who could you call for help? How can you build a community to make such activity possible? How could you be part of such a community?

 A people betrayed by their state may have to become their own state, may have to start from scratch. Its better than screaming about eternal villains when no hero has yet risen to smite them.

 On the bright side, increasing numbers of ethnic Europeans have the above vision already. It may be the only thing that saves them from the curse of Babel, even if it means a century of thankless toil and graft before fruit can be borne. Our bloodlines have perhaps earned their hardship now for generations of neglect.

Imposition over Rights

Part 1. Rights

So much discourse now is on the basis of Rights. The flabby mouths of flaccid professors, the oily rhetoric of political actors, the smooth, consistent printout of an opinion-news reader, the eyebrow-raised dialogue of the now proliferant internet pundits of every ideology and association all bear this brand.

 An alien visitor might see this word and its frequency and at first assume it is the basis upon which all of human morals are founded. A concept birthed by a culture in its ascendancy now slips from the clammy hands of bastardized third generation cretins as they wrestle around with inelegant thrusts of logic to claim "Rights" in order to push their ideas as justified.

 We ALL have a Right to a home, to a family, to a fair shot at a good job, to a quality education, to a stable, safe society.

 We also have the right to travel freely from one area of the earth to the other! We also have the right to live a life without being made to feel unsafe or threatened by others! And the understanding of what constitutes a threat, what constitutes an inappropriate comment and what constitutes an imposition on our Rights, is within our rights to define for ourselves!

 There are those people, disgusting, wretched people, who have threatened the rights of others, and who would deny them their rights (which they have earned on the basis of the basic, essential humanity that they are born into, and which requires NO further exploration or understanding). They have so done by various methods of oppression, the aim of which was to enrich themselves and expropriate rights, and quality of life (to which all have a RIGHT to possess and have maintained for them by an eternal governing element, a great hanging tit of endless nourishment). These people are evil, and if you are a member of these peoples your rights have been too great for too long. New changes SHOULD be put in place to correct this.

 If you are of a category of humanity that has suffered an expropriation of rights, you have the RIGHT to receive compensation of such, because Rights a debt to which every human is owed, and if not constantly provided on an equitable basis, an interest and due payment will accrue until the whole amount is adequately provided to the sufferer. It is their RIGHT to determine at what point satisfaction is gained.

 What a happy, fecund breed of pigs crawls about the earth! They are stuffed to the gills and waddle with their heads to the ground. The farmer operates without a care or a worry, he has the envy of the county as his animals swell and reproduce and offer themselves up without a hint of feral nature. Ere the fence should rot, they rush to him squealing and he can immediately, with the great efficiency inherent to a man of experience, mend it without further issue. He loves his pigs as much as a man can, and gets every ounce of joy from them that he can.

 Part 2. Imposition

 A man demands what his heart desires, and forces it into his hands. He takes it or is repelled. What is to stop him? Only those with more ability to push and resist.

 This force is multiplied as men grow and are able to cooperate. Those who can still take initiative will be the takers, those who cannot settle for their portion. Sharing and working together and loving ones kin is natural to us, but it has within it a selfish element.

 As human settlements grow larger, those dominant elements grow more complex. A king cannot threaten every man below his station with a club, he is no longer the physical superior. His society is now a group formed of subgroups, and a balance of quality of life, recognition, the complexities of religion and the threat of a consolidated military will be applied by the ruling element to manage the mass beneath.

 "Rights" are a perfect tool for management of people. Convince people they exist and then convince them that you are maintaining them, and they multiply perceived comfort, and create a defensive patriotism which can be leveraged to defend the societal system from destabilization. Any rebel is a threat to "Rights", but these "Rights can be adjusted by the ruling power on a whim, so long as their mouthpiece is lithe enough to push it in an attractive manner.

 What use are "Rights" that you cannot defend without the government? Your Rights are the governments brand on your thick, cows hide! You have no choice in what "Rights" you have an when it is appropriate your way of living will be declared an imposition on your part upon the "Rights" of a better breed of man!

 This way of thinking is a glowing Achilles testicle hanging down from the hosen of every fashionable nationalist, populist and hanger on who hopes the present government can come to its senses.

 There is nothing but the imposition of power. Those with the government supported correct view on race are very aware of this. The more instinctive, less domesticated, ethnically non-castrated, racially non-european members of western society are well aware of this. They call you racist, and they laugh inside, you white dog. They call you a phobic when you wave your statistics. You are crying to them

 "You are such a bully, you are such a brute, you do evil to us and mock us!"

and they jeer back

 "Yes we do! and your government lets us do it! We all know it happens and nobody will stop it!"

There is no Right that exists without the imposition of power. Many who oppose Marxist views are correct when they state that life is not only about power, but conflict is, in that the weaker element will be crushed in a direct conflict. When you are kicked in the stomach by a man shrieking about his human rights, you are being Imposed upon. When the government refers to this individual while dodging every clear path to describing what kind of a man he is, this is an imposition of his power on you, and their power to ignore you, who should have a "right" to protection by the state.

 You will get no mercy, until you find a way out from under the boot. You will get no rights, until you impose them upon the world.

 Many are now open to this reality, and the boxers weave is now being conducted with increasing speed and effectiveness. There will not be an oppressed people soon, but the powerful fourth generation, fueled by the discomfort of his lame fathers passivity, who will stand erect, move forward, and force aside those who try to push him.

Draft for Yellow Hill: Doors of Flame within the Church 1

Key in hand, Arlad approached the great oak entrance to the church. A fine layer of ash now covering the oak and iron bars, the building was surprisingly unmolested given the state of the town the had just fought his way through. On the each of the central iron bars that spanned the width of both of the two doors, were several iron rings, through which a heavy black bar had been inserted and locked in place. The padlock itself was ornate and clearly of the church, the holy symbol etched just above the keyhole. Melain kept a lookout behind them as Arlad removed the lock and quietly slid the bar from the rings.

 "Would we not be better served looking for a more discrete entrance? Such efforts had been made to prevent our access to the church from without, surely an even more ferocious defense may await us within"

 She spoke quickly to him, without removing her gaze from the ashen street from which they had just approached; the body of a slain foe slumped over a charred fence strand, oily hair covering his face and an arrow half snapped, standing fastly atop his upper back.

 "If this wicked fallen priest is responsible for all the evil things that have happened to this town, it wouldn't be justice to sneak up behind him. We need to confront him face to face. My father told me about these churches before, its just one big room! we shall throw open the door and he will have nowhere to run!"

 replied Arlad, having just cleared metal bar from the final ring, and in one smooth motion he slid the thing onto the ground to his side, mistakenly assuming the soil at the side of the cobbled road was soft enough to produce no sound.

 Melain drew closer to him and they each began to push on the heavy doors, forcing their way in to the building.

 The smoke outside had darkened the sky, however its impact was felt greatly in the church, where almost no light was able to penetrate the stained glass windows. It was silent but for the slight crackle of firewood. Ahead of them were rows of long, short benches of plain wood with little ornamentation, seated upon red carpets, hue dimmed in the darkness. Large hewn stone blocks made up the walls and floor, and ascending wooden beams decorated with wood carvings made amorphous by shadow lined the ceiling. The door slammed shut behind them as they were blasted by a cold blast of air.

 Ahead of them and at the raised platform at the far end of the building were two braziers at either side, in front of the rows of benches. Simple trapezoid stone stands topped by wide, shallow metal dishes upon which burned two small orange fires. A formless shadow stood between them.

 "Step down from the stage you villain! the trouble you started is now at its end!"

 shouted Arlad. The figure billowed as the cold breeze continued to push against the pair, revealing itself to be a shrouded being of human height. The deep, penetrating words of a skilled orator issued forth.

 "Brave as you have been and quick of sword to find me here, but you are a fly upon the hammer of the true god. The king of the stars has made me an offer I cannot refuse, greater than the promise of life after death. And all he asked of me in return, is to keep the doors open!"

 Melain reached for the scourge at her hip, and Arlad drew his sword, when the figure swung his arms wide, two hands, pale in the light of the flames, pointing to each brazier, and in an instant there was a flash of light, a blast of noise like a tree being torn from the earth, and the flame of the braziers lept forwards to the stone floor below them and reaching upwards until they reached halfway up the height of the interior of the church.

 Both heroes stood in confusion, but Melain took initiative and ran forward with her scourge, nearing the gap between the two columns of fire, preparing to strike at the figure. Noticing this, Arlad snapped out of his distraction and ran after her. Having closed half the distance, Melain drew back her arm, when at the corner of her eye she saw movement from the column of fire to her left, and in the same instant realized there came no heat from it.

 As if the column itself had been a doorway, a wrinkled, bony limb protruded from its center, holding a jagged one sided dagger. The figure quickly leapt out of the column entirely, and Melain stopped in her tracks to face it. A vile semi-human abberation, with large eyes at either side of its narrow head, which attached to its sternum with no visible neck. It was naked, but for the weapon it wielded in one hand, and a round metal buckler attached to its right side wrist, with a rusted spike jutting from the center. Immediately Melain adjusted her position and lashed at the creature, the two hooks of her scourge cutting deepy into the side of its head before it could react, and it fell motionless to the ground.

 At this moment the dark figure on the platform reached out his hand towards her and made a bizarre pointing gesture, and at the same time her body was knocked backwards as if she had been kicked in the stomach, sending her stumbling into the benches behind her and losing her balance. The figure immediately doubled over and was reduced to a crouch, evidently fatigued by the exertion.

 Arlad saw this as his opportunity to strike and ran to the gap between the columns of fire, when again, from the right side, a monstrosity similar to the first appeared, wielding a wooden club, and immediately swung it at Arlad, hitting him in the ribs as he was running, and sending him to the floor. The creature immediately strode forwards and stood over him, looked down with unblinking, lidless eyes and reached upwards for an overhead strike, but was skewered in the abdomen as Arlad quickly countered with his blade. It staggered backwards but made no sound but for a heavy hacking breath. Arlad rolled backwards, one hand on his side and sword in the other, tensed and lunged forwards. The beast artlessly swung its club again, now mechanically hindered by its punctured stomach, and Arlad slipped to its side, rammed his shoulder into its back and with his left leg swept the creature to the floor, before plunging his sword into its neck, bringing the beast gurgling and thrashing to its demise.

 Melain was back to her feet, and saw the figure, its hood now fallen to one side, revealing a wizened and frail old man, still catching his breath. She shouted towards him.

 "Fallen Priest, your witchcraft has failed you! You are an old man and will not live if you fight us! Surrender now and we will spare you, for the judgement of your countries courts!"

 The old man pushed himself up upon his feet, and boomed out once more, strong in voice despite his evident frailty of body

 "An undying one accuses me of witchcraft! No, there is no magic that I do here, only the will of a new King. I am a gauntlet through which his hand smites!"

 and with that, he shot his hands forward, crossed over each other, and released a frothing groan. In front of him a red mass coagulated, a thick slime, bubbling and steaming and rising to the height of a person. As he did this, another wretch leapt from the rightmost pillar of fire, bearing its weapon down upon Arlad, who was saved only by his cat-like reflexes. At once the Old Man brought his hands up, and the red mass shot forth like a tumbling stone, heading straight towards Melain. She lept out of its path as it crashed down to the wall at the right hand side of the entrance, leaving a smouldering stain on the stone floor, the carpets below withered and the wooden benches cleft in its wake.

The young lad grew frustrated at their situation, as he ran through the third monstrosity to emerge from the fires; however a plan jolted into his mind. He gave the order to Melain "Run to the wall, and we trap him!" to the her immediate compliance, and in the opposite direction he did likewise, as another pair of creatures lurched out from the fires.

 The two now ran, alongside the walls of the church, up towards the platform, with the priests unholy familiars in pursuit. As the distance closed, the priests thrust his left arm out, and again a red mist began to congeal in front of him, his eyes fixed on Arlad; but his attention was drawn to the slam of boots on tiled floor, and his head swivelled around to see image of a warrior woman leaping towards him, dagger thrust forward and flying through the air like an arrow fired from a longbow. His faded eyes glimmered with fear as his old body crumpled under the force of steel and muscle bearing down on him. Melain fell upon her foe and they hit the ground as one. Seconds later Arlad had reached the same point, and watched as the columns of fire shrank and diminished into smoke, and the final pair of creatures staggered in confusion, and their bodies flakes and splintered into the air, like ash being blown into the wind.

 In the passage of mere seconds, the church was silent and still, but for the dim crackling of the braziers, and the heavy breathing of Arland and Melain, as they looked upon the body of their defeated enemy.

Gods Creation, mortal creation

The separation of God and Man is that god is the creative force, who is within and without everything, and alone has the ability to create anything, being the pillar that holds up reality. He is outside of energy and thus he is not spent when he acts upon something. He is outside of time and thus does not atrophy. He is beyond morality and thus there is no venom in his killing and no mercy in his rescue.

 God is the source of all creation and the initial spark, before and without him there is and was nothing, and without anything existing he also cannot exist as the opposing force of diminishing mortal existence. God created and is the will of creation and his intention is the continuation of creation.

 Man is the creation of God, and is separate from God in that he is limited in all that God is limitless. His abilities, intellect, potential and persistence through time have boundaries. People suffer because people die, and many will resent god for allowing this. But all things must be able to die as there are none within creation but god that can create without spending themselves. All of life is a process of creation and regeneration. All living things must sacrifice their own lives in the continuation of their species, which grants them group longevity with the aim of immortality.

 One day the sun will explode and all life on earth will end, but there will be a new creation.

 God is infinite and thus all things are in his image, as one of limitless dimensions of the infinite nature of the deity.

The limit of Christian Morality

In my estimation one of the central ideas to modern "western" morality is the popular Christian doctrine

Do unto others as you would have them do to you

Which sees as much secular support as it does religious. This underpins our justification for many actions and obligations the state commits to on behalf of its public. We hope that in our times of need someone may take care of us, and should thus be willing to do the same for others, and so nationalized healthcare and the welfare state are justified and funded by the taxpayer.

 It is considered a "right" to be safe from torture, abuse and oppression by the state, and thus western nations extend a charitable hand to those from countries that are less stable, even moreso if there are historical scars between the saviour country and the fleeing victim groups, as our post Christian secular society strongly believes that its current iteration still bears responsibility for past injustices committed upon the rest of the world (that this is taken advantage of by unscrupulous characters is also most likely the fault of western nations as no other peoples on earth have agency).

 We (the population as an extension of the will of the government by way of our taxed income being the energy by which the whole organism develops itself) believe in
-Equality of opportunity for all peoples
-Supporting those in need
-Freedom of expression

 The existence and continuation of morality is dependent on peoples willingness to support it. One pillar of the arguments with regards to culture, for the liberal, socialist and civic nationalist positions, is that this morality is SELF SUSTAINING so long as people are integrated into adopting it. An ethnic nationalist position will argue this morality is either INHERENT or DEVELOPED by the group from whence it emerged, and even similar systems in other areas are unique to their people, and even when adopted by others they must, as consequence of the diversity of racial stratification, become changed or adjusted in the process. (this explains why countries with culturally progenated systems of government are generally more successful than countries forced to adopt foreign systems, as can be seen in the post-colonial stories of African and Asian nations)

 A Secular/Christian Moralist may not believe death is the end, and may truly embrace the inevitable conclusion of his race, since it no longer is of consequence to him. So long as there are Christian feet treading the earth regardless of genetic lineage, his creed lives on. Ethnically oriented people enjoy no such relief; if they die childless their line is ended, if their people vanish through war, disaster or genetic assimilation (that outpaces or negates cultural preservation), then this is TRUE DEATH, that is not rewarded with an afterlife, and is a singular failure.

 Such a person cannot afford to follow a morality that places them on the back foot. Every person in the west who begins to feel the inkling that the full connectivity of the world now places every group in direct competition with one another, must now reconsider the extent to which they may remain disinterested in the continuation of their family, and whatever they consider to be the extension of that. Even those who do not feel any sense of brotherhood from a racial perspective must consider what they would wish for their grand and great grandchildren.

 If all good and honest people allow themselves to fade away for the sake of their charity, then they are responsible for the world that will be created. Morality is implemented once one has the power to do so, and when society breaks down again every man once more is a hoarding beast. If you believe that men should be kind to each other, to pity the weak and help the needy, and you see a world wherein that doesn't happen, then your morality has failed, and will not come to pass until it is IMPOSED again.

 If the whole world is connected, if every home, every job, every resource is now within reach of every human being, then we should see the growth of desperation, of the beast morality of the starving, as now the desire for comfort is combined with the perception that comfort and safety is always limited, always occupied and must be wrested from its current owner.

 England is a country with a specific carrying capacity, as is Europe a landmass likewise, as is America and eventually the whole world. You are occupying space that others may want, and now the whole world can make such an observation and operate on such a basis. Christian Morality sacrifices race and ethnicity, the decision must be made which one you value more.

Mob response

Recent events have brought back to my memory a realization that fundamentally changed my outlook on life around one year ago.

 The recent event is one of the newer instances of Europeans naively going unprepared to an African nation and being murdered therein. The primary instinctive reaction is one of empathic despair, like when a defenseless animal is predated. Suffering of humans at the hands of other humans is particularly stomach churning, a hopeless situation that concludes only as the tormentor loses interest.

 The incident that caused a change in my way of thinking however, was something that happened in England in late 2016 or early 2017. One of the terrorist attacks in London where knife wielding attackers ran around a restauranted area. The news articles described people being instructed to hide under tables in buildings by police, and an old white guy in a pub getting stabbed while trying to defend the place.

 My first thought at the time was: If there were a few attackers, armed with knifes, running towards a public area filled with outdoor seating, tables covered in cutlery and (presumably) porcelain tableware, surely if every man and rugby playing woman in the area just began throwing knives, plates, chairs at the attackers, they would have potentially neutralized them completely?

 Obviously if there are guns involved in an area where the public is disarmed it is a different story, but even so.. Poor men, women and children in the middle east fight tooth and nail against western military or oppositional local forces, but ourselves, even in huge numbers, can only run!

 How obedient we are, what Eloi we have become!

 But then I turned this thought to myself. If I were there at the time, being at the closest table to the parked car, and saw these men approach, machete in hand; what would be my response? The fact that I could not both immediately and honestly say to myself that I would retaliate with blood in my teeth and without flinching at the thought of dying in the process deeply disgusted me. I am not a soldier, I have never been a particularly aggressive man, but what value is there in having a patriotic feeling, or to tell oneself that one cares about ones culture, ethnicity, race or whatever, if deep down it is apparent that I may fail to defend it in the most vital way?

 I realize that part of this is down to Mob Response. People on twitter are conditioned to be rhetorical piranhas whenever somebody worth taking down utters something down-takeable. If it turned out that your real life social circle would start calling you a cunt and stop having drinks with you once you become a vindictive report button presser, such a blood thirsty environment may not have developed. The majority of people in any extreme movement did not carry out extreme actions out of a thorough understanding and agreement with the extreme ideology of the movement, but because it was established already, that this behavior is the trademark of that particular group.

 People in the West have been saved from a propensity for group physical violence. Mobs are a thing of lynching, inquisition, and (though they will never openly identify it as such) certain types of political action that are commonly seen in less developed nations. We have lost that instinct entirely. When a threat approaches us as a group, we respond as individuals. When you are at a party and a group of men start molesting the women you respond as an individual who says "what if THEY have a knife, what could I do about it?" you no longer think "WE should get rid of THESE bastards". There is no WE for the group who does not exist, who is simultaneously responsible for all of the suffering that THEM the poor exploited.

 I have no proposed solution this issue, but perhaps first we should reflect on what we ourselves would be willing to risk at the moment of mortality. If we are not willing to risk our lives to protect what we love, and if we are not able to recognize this potential in our fellow men, then we are as vulnerable as those misguided fools who now lie desecrated in a foreign country. If we know what is at stake, it is hubris not to evaluate our own ability deal with it.

 P.S. for the sake of anyone sharing this, I am not advocating hate crimes, I am advocating a willingness to defend you and the people you love.

Diasporatic groups and the rest of us

There are two major Diasporatic peoples who have a major presence in Europe (only one has successfully established its presence in the states as a defined and seperate group) as follows:

-Cultural Jews
-Gypsies

These groups are considered Diasporatic for the following reasons

-They are recognized as belonging to their group through multiple factors before geography is even considered
-As a group they do not have a fixed location and there may be tens of generations in time distance since a family belonging to this group was ever based at the geographical origin of their culture
-They are present in a multitude of nations without open conflict, without assimilating and becoming part of the host nation. They are able to exist culturally parallel to the host nations people with varying levels of complicity in the host culture (without a generalized assimilation or surrendering of their own cultural norms)
-In times of strife or rejection, groups belonging to this culture are not only able to relocate but will proactively move to new areas
-Groups belonging to the diaspora may support brother and sister groups based in different nations, possibly in spite of or intentionally to the detriment of their hosts

These two diasporatic groups are both culturally confident as they are able to continue in spite of the hardships they face as a people with no geographical, however they show vastly different levels of cultural development and material success, in part because of the attitude towards and relationships maintained with the static communities they flow through.

-Gypsies are physically, immediately abrasive to the host culture they find themselves in, as they separate themselves from host society, and often adopt a scavenger style of existence which disconnects them morally from static communities. The total lack of integration with host communities, the treatment of law as a parents disciplining hand that is to be fled from or wriggled out of makes destroys any option for trust or cohesion. In the UK it is common to be prejudiced against Gypsy caravan groups and anyone living in proximity to them would be able to sympathize with a dehumanizing comment someone may make about them.

-Cultural Jews have a much more effective relationship with static civilizations which has brought them great success in terms of average wealth, average influence in global politics and national politics, and presence in sought after positions. I believe this is because they adopt a strategy for integration which follows the same principles as interest based lending, in all key aspects of their interactions with static communities. Cultural Jews as a rule place high importance on learning and logical and rhetorical skills in particular that have developed out of their religious concepts and attitudes towards God. A man who believes everything can be bargained for will naturally be skilled at bartering.

 They will thus be able to approach a host community with skills, trades and positive attributes in a diplomatic manner, and any host would wish to be exploit a people who will make him rich, especially in historical Europe where they brought skills that Christians were unable themselves to exercise due to religious constraints. But the interest to be collected after such a great loaning of talent and enterprise, is that the host community now has within it a group of people who may quietly, and seemingly benignly operate in the interests of their own group, in ways that are so subtle that they are often not appreciated until things get out of hand. It is fairly obvious when this happens as it becomes another historical event in which the eternally suffering Israelites yet again are oppressed by the wicked gentile Romans.

 Discrimination without reason is ignorant and discrimination resulting from peer pressure is intellectually lazy, however it is crucial that people can gain an appreciation for the true scale of diversity in culture that covers the world, that does not make people evil but does explain why evil things will happen. A pogrom does not need to happen cleanse the holy lands from usurpers until the wise men ignore the potential consequences of letting every throne of finance, of government, of entertainment or of industry become occupied by a group of people who naturally will identify, sympathize and seek to support their own kind.

 The grievance that former colonial nations hold against the west is that western nations installed their own people in every position of power and as a result the sweat of these nations was used to fulfill the interests of their oppressors. We were never conquered by a vast horde of Jews nor roving bands of tarmac wielding, scrap metal hungry Gypsies yet here we are somehow. Should the current paradigm finally shift and European Nations begin acting in their own interests again, keep a close eye on people like Tommy Robinson. Theres nothing wrong with having Ezra Levant as your mate but never let him work in the media, the finance industry or become a local MP. We'll be up to our arses in Levi's again and all the NPC memes will have been wasted.